Instructions for Authors

Submission Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.

  • The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
  • The submission file is in Microsoft Word or PDF.
  • Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
  • The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.

The submission author will be a corresponding author and also he/she must be a one of authors, during the submission and review process the corresponding author must take all the responsibility. There is no page limit for manuscript..

All the papers submitted to this journal is subject to evaluation process within one month. Accepted papers are published within seven days after completing the acceptance procedure.

Initial submission can be any format and Editorial office will send templates file after completing the acceptance procedure to the corresponding author. Also authors can download article template here .

Download article template here

Terms of submission

All the manuscripts need to be submitted based on their originality and it has not been previously published elsewhere and only being considered by this journal.

Reviewer Suggestions

The authors have to suggest three potential reviewers while submitting articles in the submission process. Please provide detailed contact information (office address, e-mail address). The editors may not necessarily approach these referees.

Peer review

Upon the submission of the articles, the editorial team will be looking for the scope of the journal and technical correctness. The state-of-art plagiarism tools can be used to access the originality of the articles then the reviewer will be assigned by the corresponding editor. The initial review process may take average of one month duration based on that first decision will be made to further revise/accept/reject the articles. Formal publication procedure will start to go for proofreading.

Article types

The journal will consider the following article types:
Review papers, Research articles, Short communication, Editorial note.


Initial submission can be any format and Editorial office will send templates file after completing the acceptance procedure to the corresponding author.


The final copy of the articles will be sent to the corresponding author and it must be verified and return to the editorial office within two to three days.

Copyright / Open Access

All articles published in the publication are based on the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). Authors hold the entire copyright of the articles.

Publishing Ethics

The publication of an editorial in a peer-reviewed journal is a basic building square within the advancement of a coherent and regarded organize of information. It could be a coordinate reflection of the quality of the work of the creators and the teach that back them.Peer-reviewed articles support and exemplify the logical method. Itis subsequently vital to concur upon guidelines of anticipated moral conduct for allparties included within the act of distributing: the creator, the journal editor, the peer analyst,the distributer and the society of society-owned or supported journals. The editors of this journal implement a thorough peerreview handle beside strict moral approaches and guidelines to guarantee to include high quality logical works to the field of scholarly publication.


We do not encourage any kind of similarity/duplicate/copy from any other sources without consent. As per our journal policy, all submitted manuscripts will undergo initial plagiarism checks, if any similarity found more than the standard allowable limit the manuscript will be rejected or sent back to the authors. If any type of retraction, scientific misconduct found, the authors will be intimated to the corresponding affiliation and black listed and will not be allowed for future submission.

Editorial Procedures and Peer-Review

Initial Checks

All submitted manuscripts received by the Editorial systems will undergo suitability and scope of the corresponding journal whether it satisfies the journal criteria or not. Once it is found out of scope and not fulfilling the scientific guidelines for use of human subjects, experiments involving clinical trials with human, animals will be summerly rejected. As a matter of policy all the submitted manuscripts should follow theethical standard in such a way that solely submitted to this journal and same manuscripts submitted more than one journal leads to unethical publishing and it is unacceptable if the authors decided to submit manuscripts to other journals then the concern manuscripts should be withdrawn by the author from the Editorial systems.


Once initial screening of the manuscripts is done then it is passed to the journal editor in order to allot two independent subject’s experts for peer-review. We follow single blind peer review systems. The author has provision to choose two reviewers for their choice and also exclude potential reviewers in the list. The allotted reviewers will not be known to authors at any cost, a strict confidentiality will be maintained.

Editorial Decision and Revision

Once the reviewer comments are received, the editor has the right to decide whether accept or reject the articles based on reviewers’ comments. The majority of the reviewer’s comments will be taken into account in some specific cases additional reviewers will be invited to give the feedbacks based on this final decision will be disclosed. Our editorial system follows the decision as given below

Accept with Minor Revisions:

As per reviewer suggestions, the manuscripts can be revised and resubmitted to the editorial systems after modification. The response to the reviewer comments should be suitably addressed point by point and if any rebuttal against reviewer comments or statements, then it has to be appropriately addressed by the authors.

Reconsider with Major Revisions:

After receiving consolidated reviewer reports, the editor will make a decision if further any major modification suggested by the reviewers in order to improve the quality of the article then the author will be given a chance to revise the article. Once again, the articles will be sent back to the reviewers for first round of review.

Upon receiving the comments, whether the revised manuscripts fulfil the concerns raised by the reviewers then it will be accepted. After revision still reviewers’ feedbacks are not satisfied then it will be sent back to the rejection desk.

Reject and Revised version Resubmission:

If any incomplete survey, scientific methods, insufficient data, inappropriate results, less scientific importance and novelty manuscripts will be rejected directly and the author will be encouraged to submit with latest revised version.


If the article has more similarity index, serious flaws against publications ethics it will be completely rejected.